2018 Toyota C-HR vs. 2017 Honda HR-V: Compare Cars – Small crossover utility vehicles have surged in popularity, and every carmaker is rolling out new entries. The Honda HR-V has already been popular, and yearly after it was launched, the Toyota C-HR usually maker’s riposte. It’s small brother on the immensely popular RAV4 compact crossover, just as the HR-V is an inferior sibling to your equally popular CR-V.
They’re both light-duty vehicles suitable for city and suburban use by young families or couples. But about the Honda offers optional all-wheel drive, for better traction and security on muddy athletic fields and unplowed roads. Although AWD can be found around the C-HR in Europe and Japan, Toyota says it sees little demand for doing it around the U.S., so it will be not offered.
The exaggerated styling the hands down small SUVs functions to disguise the “tall hatchback on wheels” form of most utility vehicles. The C-HR (it is known as “Coupe, High Riding”) comes with the most expressive lines of any small crossover, but we presume it works more effectively as opposed to Prius or Mirai used similar design themes. The rakish Honda uses the brand’s usual styling language—a thick chrome top bar for your grille, swept-back front light units, and strongly etched side accent lines—to supply the HR-V some pizazz. Its rear end, however, looks merely a shrunken copy of the newest Acura MDX.
2018 Toyota C-HR vs. 2017 Honda HR-V: Compare Cars
Inside the given hood, the Toyota offers merely one powertrain: a 144-horsepower 2.0-liter 4-cylinder engine paired to a new continuously variable transmission driving the leading wheels. In spite of the “utility vehicle” label, all-wheel drive isn’t available. Honda operates on the all 141-hp 1.8-liter inline-4, associated with whether continuously variable transmission or possibly a 6-speed manual. All-wheel drive is an option around the Honda, unlike the C-HR, although only with all the CVT. Neither car is quick, the Honda felt stronger in high-demand circumstances like highway merges. Both little SUVs are based on car underpinnings and handle sufficiently, although we’d give the sting to your Toyota. The C-HR has less seating position lower as opposed to Honda, which lessens the design of body roll in turns.
Are both capacious for small SUVs, though the Honda is the roomiest vehicle around the segment. A corner seat on the HR-V accommodates two adults with generous head and leg room, plus two up front. The HR-V also provides Honda’s unique “Magic Seat,” which folds and flips the second-row seat just like a lawn chair to choose from multiple storage and seating configurations. The Toyota is roomier than it looks inside, both front and rear, and rear seat folds flat, the load floor is surprisingly high, at mid-thigh. Both vehicles are pleasingly quiet and refined inside on good road surfaces; drivers and passengers will see most travel peaceful in either one.
The Toyota C-HR hasn’t yet been rated either by its NHTSA or IIHS, the Honda HR-V received mixed ratings for your HR-V on the newest menu of crash tests.
The Toyota comes standard with 10 airbags together with a suite of active-safety features, but visibility out there back isn’t very good, because rising window line, steeply raked rear window, and incredibly thick roof pillars. The HR-V gives the rearview camera and tire pressure monitors as standard, and Honda’s nifty sideview LaneWatch camera may well be an option. But blind-spot monitors and adaptive cruise control likely won’t arrive around the HR-V for only a couple of model years.
With a base price around $20,000, all Honda HR-V models include power windows, locks, and mirrors; a rearview camera; a tiling and telescoping tyre with audio controls; and Bluetooth with audio streaming. Higher trim levels add a huge touchscreen interface; the LaneWatch camera; keyless ignition; paddle shifters; satellite radio; navigation; leather; a sunroof; and heated front seats.
The C-HR comes well-equipped in either from the two trim levels, and will be offering merely single option, but numerous dealer customization accessories. It starts at roughly $23,500, potentially steep for this purpose highly polarizing design that appears smaller than it is.
Both Toyota C-HR and therefore the Honda HR-V are comfy and accomplished small utility vehicles. With missing safety scores and fuel-economy ratings that weren’t finalized, our rating for your C-HR is sort of incomplete. But hitherto, Honda wins on interior room, slightly better performance, and value for money. Given both companies’reputations for high-quality cars, however, we expect buyers of either car to finish up relatively satisfied.
Our comparison between 2018 Toyota C-HR vs. 2017 Honda HR-V